Thursday, June 28, 2012

Honoring Our Common Ground


Honoring Our Common Ground

Categories: Civil Rights, Veterans & Military
By Jonathan Young, Chairman, National Council on Disability (NCD), with the assistance of Lonnie Moore, Member, National Council on Disability
On Sunday, June 3, Lonnie Moore and I had the honor of joining Arizona Center for Disability Law Executive Director Peri Jude Radecic, Deputy Executive Director Ed Myers and J.J. Rico, Member of the Arizona Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness (PAIMI) Council, to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. Lonnie and I represent the coming together of the Veterans community and the disability community. He is a disabled Iraq War Veteran and I am a civilian who is partially paralyzed as the result of a spinal cord injury.
While it might not be obvious at first glance, a brief review of history shows that disability issues and Veterans issues are intertwined; that Veterans issues are disability issues. The history of Americans with disabilities and returning Veterans reveals much common ground.
Some of the first attempts to guarantee rights and services for people with disabilities were sparked by WWI Veterans seeking needed supports after returning from the war.  Following the “Great War,” the National Defense Act, the Smith-Hughes Act and the Soldier’s Rehabilitation Act were among the first legislative attempts to establish vocational services for disabled Veterans as the nation acknowledged an obligation to support soldiers injured in service to our nation.
In 1920, the Citizen’s Rehabilitation Act recognized the common ground of disabled citizens and injured Veterans by expanding vocational guidance and placement services to include all Americans with physical disabilities.
During World War II, the sudden shortage of skilled workers provided an unprecedented opportunity for people with disabilities to gain employment in vacant jobs. When the war ended, however, many workers with disabilities who supported the war effort at home found themselves again unemployed as large numbers of non-disabled soldiers returned to work in civilian jobs.
Congress pursued policy-based solutions designed to meet the needs of civilians with disabilities and disabled Veterans following the Korean and Vietnam conflicts, always trying to meet the specific needs of those who served in each war and the disabilities they acquired in doing so. The same has been true for soldiers returning from recent engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan.
NCD’s recent forum on acquired disabilities “Common Ground,” held at UCLA on June 8, brought together disabled Veterans and civilians alike for a day of panel discussions, presentations and discussions to examine the best ways to design and implement practical solutions for the concerns our communities have going forward. As history has shown, the more our communities can support one another and work cooperatively, the better. Each group grows stronger when we’re together.
All Americans owe a great debt to those who have served this country – especially those who made the ultimate sacrifice. Placing a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns is more than symbolic. It acknowledges the interconnected past of American civilians and Veterans with disabilities by honoring the important collaborations and coordinated efforts that have ensured protections our fallen warriors, in part, fought and died for.
Remembering  the sacrifices of the past reminds us of the responsibility shared by every American – including people with disabilities – as we work toward a more fair, equitable and inclusive future for all.
For more information:
To find out more about NCD and the work we do, visit the NCD website, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.
Jonathan M. Young, Ph.D., is the Chairman of the National Council on Disability, which is a Senate-confirmed Presidential appointment. He is Partner and General Counsel at FoxKiser, a firm specializing in strategic collaboration and counseling in law, science and medicine – and was the co-founder and former Chair of the Committee on Disability Power & Pride.  
Lonnie Moore is a Member of the National Council on Disability and currently serves as a Program Analyst for the Army Warrior Transition Office, where he writes policy and makes recommendations to improve care and transition for wounded and ill soldiers. He also serves as the Western Chair for the Secretary of Veteran’s Affairs Service Members and Families Council. Mr. Moore was combat-wounded in Iraq, where he led more than 60 combat missions.
 
Source: http://usodep.blogs.govdelivery.com/2012/06/26/honoring-our-common-ground/

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Our friends at USA.gov and GobiernoUSA.gov, the official Web portals of the U.S. government, have put together helpful information on how to get help for difficult financial times.

Our friends at USA.gov and GobiernoUSA.gov, the official Web portals of the U.S. government, have put together helpful information on how to get help for difficult financial times.

If times are tough for you and your family, your neighbors, or your friends, we encourage you to sign up now for email updates below:
Once you sign up, USA.gov and GobiernoUSA.gov will highlight government resources that will help you with unemployment, jobs, training, housing, debt and credit, family issues, health care, and insurance.

 
                  
 

Justice Department Obtains Landmark $10.5 Million Settlement to Resolve Disability-Based Housing Discrimination Lawsuit

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Monday, June 25, 2012
Justice Department Obtains Landmark $10.5 Million Settlement to Resolve Disability-Based Housing Discrimination Lawsuit
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department today announced its largest-ever disability-based housing discrimination settlement fund to resolve allegations that JPI Construction L.P. and six other JPI entities (collectively “JPI”) based in Irving, Texas, discriminated on the basis of disability in the design and construction of multifamily housing complexes throughout the United States.
Under the settlement, which was approved today by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, JPI will pay $10,250,000 into an accessibility fund to provide retrofits at properties built by JPI and to increase the stock of accessible housing in the communities where these properties are located.  The settlement also requires JPI to pay a $250,000 civil penalty.  This is the largest civil penalty the Justice Department has obtained in any Fair Housing Act case.
“Today’s historic settlement demonstrates the Justice Department’s commitment to protecting the fair housing rights of persons with disabilities,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.  “Builders of multifamily housing must consider accessibility at the outset, or they risk significantly greater expense to retrofit properties.  As a result of this settlement, multifamily housing complexes will be retrofitted to comply with the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and persons with physical disabilities will be afforded an equal opportunity to live in and visit these properties.”
“Equal access to housing for persons with disabilities is an important right protected by federal law,” said U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Sarah R. Saldaña.  “This settlement will help eliminate barriers and send a clear message that disability discrimination will not be tolerated.  Disabled residents should know that this district remains committed to protecting their fair housing rights.”
The lawsuit was filed in March 2009, after the Justice Department conducted an investigation and found accessibility barriers at various JPI properties.  Since 1991, JPI and its affiliates built 210 multifamily properties in 26 states and the District of Columbia; trial involving 32 of JPI’s properties was scheduled to begin July 9, 2012.
In addition to the $10.5 million payment, the consent order prohibits JPI from discriminating on the basis of disability in the future and from interfering with or preventing the retrofitting that will take place at the JPI properties.  Although JPI is no longer in the multifamily development and construction business, if JPI reenters the business, it is required to design and construct covered multifamily dwellings to fully comply with the requirements of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The JPI entities that are responsible for paying the settlement amount are: JPI Construction L.P.; Multifamily Construction L.L.C.; JPI Apartment Development L.P., dba JPI Campus Quarters; Lifestyle Apartment Development Service L.L.C.; Jefferson Bend L.P., dba Jefferson at Mission Gate Apartments; Jefferson Lake Creek L.P., dba Jefferson Center Apartments; and Apartment Community Realty L.L.C.
The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability and familial status.  Individuals who believe that they may have been victims of housing discrimination should call the Housing Discrimination Tip Line (1-800-896-7743) or email the Justice Department at fairhousing@usdoj.gov.  Such persons may also contact the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development at 1-800-669-9777.
Fair housing enforcement is a priority of the Civil Rights Division. More information about the Civil Rights Division and the laws it enforces is available at www.justice.gov/crt.
12-802
Civil Rights Division

Social Security and Kaiser Permanente Begin Partnership to Speed Up Disability Decisions Unprecedented Agreement Will Cut Cost, Save Time and Improve Service

Press Release

Monday, June 25, 2012 Press Office
For Immediate Release 410-965-8904

press.office@ssa.gov
Social Security and Kaiser Permanente Begin Partnership to Speed Up Disability Decisions
Unprecedented Agreement Will Cut Cost, Save Time and Improve Service
The Social Security Administration announced today that Kaiser Permanente, one of the nation’s largest healthcare providers, will electronically transmit complete medical records for its patients to the agency with the appropriate consent.  Social Security requests about 70,000 patient files from Kaiser Permanente each year so this seamless new system will save time and money for both partners as well as allow Social Security to make faster and more accurate decisions.
Over the last few years, Social Security had entered into similar agreements with several smaller providers to exchange medical records electronically over the Nationwide Health Information Network.  Today’s agreement marks the agency’s first move into using health information technology on a large-scale basis.
“I am confident that people will look back at today’s announcement as the most significant improvement in our disability determination process since the program began in 1956.  In today’s world it makes no sense for us to chase down paper records on an individual basis,” said Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.  “We are thrilled that Kaiser Permanente is now one of our key agents for change.”
“Kaiser Permanente is dedicated to supporting safe and secure health information exchange for members and our work with Social Security will enable our patients to obtain quicker disability decisions on their benefits,” said Lisa Caplan, Kaiser Permanente’s Senior Vice President and Business Information Officer.  “We are delighted to be working with such an innovative agency.”
More information on Social Security’s use of health IT is available at www.socialsecurity.gov/hit.
# # #
SSA Press Office  440 Altmeyer Building  6401 Security Blvd.  Baltimore, MD 21235
410-965-8904  FAX 410-966-9973

Friday, June 22, 2012

Webminar ADA FHA UFAS SS504 Codes PART I by ADAAG Consulting

 


Follow this seminar and don't hesitate in contacting us for further information: www.adaag-consulting.com

A Long View of Change


A Long View of Change

Categories: Civil Rights, Education
 Photography of L. Scott Lissner
By Guest Blogger L. Scott Lissner, President Elect, Association on Higher Education And Disability
I have spent more than 30 years in college! Most of them have been working with students who have disabilities. For nearly as long, I have been a member of the Association on Higher Education And Disability (AHEAD), which was founded in 1977 to help colleges implement the freshly minted regulations of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. For the first time colleges, at least those receiving federal funds, were forbidden from discriminating on the basis of disability and were required to provide equal access to students with disabilities. 1990 brought the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), true civil rights legislation that expanded disability rights beyond the classroom and federal funds recipients to employment and public places.
According to a report from the American Council on Education, the ADA increased participation in higher education by students with disabilities from an estimated seven percent in 1988 to nine percent in 1994. Today, the Government Accountability Office reports that 11 percent of college students report having a disability. Our understanding of disability has also grown. AHEAD now provides guidance on best practices through national conferences and 33 regional affiliates, representing a diverse network of more than 2,500 members who actively address disability issues on their campuses every day, while working on public policy at the state and national levels.
The focus has shifted from simply adding ramps to providing seamless access for people with disabilities participating in all aspects of higher education. Whether visiting a campus for a concert, lecture or football game; taking continuing education classes; participating in certificate programs; or getting advanced degrees, our members work to create a welcoming experience through universal design and accommodations. Our definition of disability has also evolved. We not only recognize a wider range of conditions, but also the fact that it is how those conditions interact with the physical and social environment that creates the disability.
The wider definition and deeper understanding of disability is reflected in the emergence of Disability Studies as a discipline on college campuses, as well as the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 and changes to the Title I, II and III regulations. Last month, AHEAD released a new document entitled “Supporting Accommodation Requests: Guidance on Documentation Practices”. The guidance identifies changes in the law and the underlying philosophy for those changes. It also provides a framework for understanding how those changes affect who is eligible for accommodations. The approach is more person-centered, uses a student’s own description of his or her needs and focuses on his or her educational and accommodation history, rather than diagnostic profiles. This collaborative approach fosters respect for individuals with disabilities.
What Will Be Different?
In some cases, nothing at all. Students who are deaf, and asking for accommodations like real-time transcription or interpreters, have generally not been asked for proof of their disability (such as an audiogram). For others, like students with learning disabilities who are requesting extended time on tests or books in alternative formats, this change is big.
In general, students will need less in the way of formal medical and psychological documentation. The ADA Amendments and the new regulations state that accommodation requests should be evaluated using a commonsense standard, without the need for specific language or extensive diagnostic evidence. A request with a clear explanation of the need will generally only need confirmation from an appropriate professional that the identified need is based on a disability.
Ensuring that accommodations provide effective access requires a process that is responsive to the unique experience and needs of each individual. Students and disability resource professionals should engage in an exploration of previous educational experiences, past use of accommodations and what has been effective and ineffective in providing access. The weight given to the individual’s description will be influenced by its clarity, internal consistency and congruency with the professional’s observations and available external documentation.
If a student is unable to clearly describe how his or her disability is connected to a barrier and how the accommodation would provide access, there will be a need to request third party documentation that explains that connection. Students will want to be prepared to describe their needs.
What Should Students Do to Prepare?
Being able to clearly describe your condition, its impact and your needs is more important than ever. The following questions will help students with this process. These questions also make a great tool for transition teams, counselors, parents and others service providers.
• How do you describe your condition?
How do you describe your condition, and how do you want it described to others? You may choose to keep information about your disability confidential. However, the disability resource office will need to have enough information to evaluate the need for accommodations and services. Instructors need considerably less information and may be told as little as what accommodations are appropriate. Even if your disability is not visible or obvious, it is likely that at some point a few of your new friends and classmates will notice an accommodation; how will you describe your situation to them?
• What is the impact of your condition?
It is helpful to think about how your condition has impacted you in various situations in the past; then to consider how it is likely to impact the typical activities you can expect to encounter at college. You may want to pay particular attention to the following contexts:
  • Classes (lectures, laboratory, physical activity, Web-based);
  • Assignments (reading, writing, calculating, keyboarding, library work);
  • Communication (speaking, listening, phone, email);
  • Evaluation (tests, papers, oral repots, group presentations/projects);
  • Time Constraints (timed tests, college deadline, assignment due dates);
  • Attendance (class, required activities out of class, residential requirements);
  • Campus (mobility; orientation/navigation, transportation);
  • Residence Halls (roommates, food issues, climate control);
  • Co-Curricular (clubs, organizations, events, athletics).
• What have you tried in the past?
What accommodations, auxiliary aids, adaptive equipment, modifications and services have been provided in the past? Which ones work well? Which ones did not?
• What do you anticipate needing at college?
Beyond College: High Stakes Testing & Employment
One frequent question I get is, “Does this apply to the testing agencies (ACT, ETS, LSAC, NBME)?” The short answer is yes. The slightly longer answer is that AHEAD’s Guidance was based in part on the revised ADA Title III regulations for Examinations and Courses (28 CFR 36.309). This regulation covers any private entity that offers examinations or courses related to applications, licensing, certification or credentialing for secondary or postsecondary education, professional or trade purposes. So the high stakes testing industry would seem to be covered.
These regulations require that any request for documentation must be reasonable and limited to the need for the modification, accommodation or auxiliary aid or service requested. They go on to say that entities must give considerable weight to documentation of past modifications, accommodations or auxiliary aids or services received in similar testing situations, or those provided in response to an Individualized Education Program (IEP) or under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
Another question I hear often is, “What will employers ask for?” The ADA Amendments Act was motivated by employment issues. In the legislation, Congress directed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to revise the ADA’s Title I regulations for employment. The new Title I regulations utilize the same approach to documenting accommodation requests.
L. Scott Lissner has served as the ADA coordinator for The Ohio State University since January of 2000. Housed in the Office of Diversity and Inclusion within the Provost’s Office, Lissner is an associate of the John Glenn School of Public Policy and serves as a lecturer for the Moritz College of Law, the Knowlton School of Architecture and Disability Studies. His teaching and public service informs his work as the university’s disability compliance officer; energizes his role in creating seamless access to all of the university’s programs, services, employment opportunities and facilities; and guides his efforts as a catalyst for disability-related initiatives. Engaged in community and professional service, Lissner is president elect of the Association on Higher Education And Disability and serves on the Board of Directors for ADA-OHIO and the Editorial Board for Thompson’s 504 Compliance Manual. Lissner has been appointed to the Columbus Advisory Committee on Disability Issues, Ohio’s Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Committee and the Ohio Governor’s Council for People with Disabilities. Lissner publishes, presents and consults frequently on disability issues.

Source:  http://usodep.blogs.govdelivery.com/2012/06/20/a-long-view-of-change/

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

A Call for Nominations: FCC Chairman's Awards for Advancement in Accessibility

A Call for Nominations: FCC Chairman's Awards for Advancement in Accessibility

by: Kris Monteith, Acting Bureau Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau

June 14th, 2012

The Commission recently announced that it would be accepting nominations for the second annual Chairman's Awards for Advancement in Accessibility (Chairman's AAA). This project, coordinated by the Commission's Accessibility and Innovation Initiative (A&I Initiative), seeks to recognize innovations in the field of Accessibility and Technology. The Chairman's AAA and the A&I initiative are based on recommendations in the National Broadband Plan, an FCC report to Congress in 2010.
In a rapidly changing world, we must ensure that newly developed technologies continue to meet the needs of people with disabilities. Technological advances, moreover, provide opportunities to bridge current accessibility gaps in a cost-effective and efficient manner. To this end, the A&I Initiative works to foster collaborative problem-solving among industry, consumer, and government stakeholders so that people with disabilities can reap the full benefit of broadband communication technologies. The Chairman's AAA encourages innovation in this field through high-profile recognition.
In 2011, nominations for the inaugural Chairman's AAA were received from a variety of entities, including small and large communication businesses, institutions of higher learning, app developers, government agencies, the assistive technology industry, and public-private partnerships. A cross-bureau advisory group was formed inside the Commission to review the nominations and advise the Chairman on the awards. Chairman Genachowski and Commissioner Copps presented awards to winners and honorable mentions at a ceremony held at the Commission on October 28, 2011. The FCC's Technology Experience Center also featured demonstrations of technologies by award winners during that month of October.
This year, the awards have been split into the following seven categories: (1) Education, College/University; (2) Deaf-Blind Solutions; (3) Video Programming Device Solutions; (4) Geo-location Solutions; (5) Mobile Apps; (6) Consumer Empowerment Information; and (7) Civic Participation Solutions. Nominations may be submitted in these categories for any technology, product, service, or practice designed to increase or promote accessibility, which is introduced to the public during the year starting July 31, 2011 and ending July 31, 2012.
The Commission is accepting nominations during the two-month period from May 31, 2012 to July 31, 2012 at the email address ChairmansAAA@fcc.gov. A nomination should include a brief description of the innovation, identification of the category of innovation, the date the innovation was introduced, and why the innovation qualifies for the Chairman's Award. Applicants can nominate themselves or others they think are deserving of such an award. Award winners will again be selected by an internal cross-bureau advisory group comprised of subject matter experts on accessibility issues. For more information please contact us at ChairmansAAA@fcc.gov. We look forward to hearing from you!

Accessible Technology in the Workplace Webcast — June 21st from 2:00pm to 3:00pm EDT

Technology

Accessible and usable workplace technologies, and various types of assistive technology, are paramount to helping people with disabilities succeed on the job and deliver for their employers. Reflecting this, ODEP has a long history of exploring policies that will advance the development and adoption of accessible, interoperable and usable information and communication technologies (ICT) in the workplace.

AT Works: Accessible Technology in the Workplace Webcast — June 21st from 2:00pm to 3:00pm EDT  

ODEP's Accessible Technology in the Workplace Initiative promotes the accessibility of workplace technology as a means to increasing the hiring, retention and advancement of people with disabilities in the public and private sector.  The "AT Works" online educational series is part of this effort.  ODEP will be hosting a series of free webcasts and webinars over the next several months to explore the connection between emerging technologies and the employment of people with disabilities.  
To kick off the series, ODEP will host a live webcast on Accessible Technology's Role in Today's Workplace.
What
  • A panel discussion moderated by Tom Temin, Anchor, Federal News Radio.
  • Panelists include Kathleen Martinez, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Disability Employment Policy; Brian Hurley, Public Affairs Director, National Industries for the Blind; and Christian Vogler, Ph.D., Associated Professor and Director of the Technology Access Program, Co-PI, RERC on Telecommunications Access, Gallaudet University.
When
  • Thursday, June 21st from 2:00pm - 3:00pm EDT
  • An archived version will be available for viewing starting the day after the event
Where
  • Access the webcast from this page on June 21st
  • The event will be live audio-captioned
  • Real-time Twitter feed with the hashtag #ATworks
  • No registration is required
Who
  • Employers, workers, policymakers, advocates and others interested in learning more about accessible technology and its impact on the employment of people with disabilities. 
Fort more information go to: http://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/Technology.htm

Take the Test. Take Control: National HIV Testing Day


Take the Test. Take Control: National HIV Testing Day

Categories: Disability.Blog News
By Miguel Gomez, Director, AIDS.gov 
Take the Test. Take Control. That’s the theme of National HIV Testing Day (NHTD), observed every year on June 27. President Obama has said National HIV Testing Day “reminds each of us to do our part in fighting HIV/AIDS and get tested. After years of critical investments in research, prevention and care, we now have the tools to stem the spread of the disease and extend the lives of those Americans living with HIV.”
As reported in a 2009 “Disability and HIV Policy Brief” from the UN Office of the High Commission for Human Rights, the World Health Organization and UNAIDS, “the relationship between HIV and disability has not received due attention, although people with disabilities are found among all key populations at higher risk of exposure to HIV.”  The brief discusses why persons with disabilities may be at risk for HIV infection. Reasons include risk behaviors, sexual violence and access to HIV education, information and prevention services.
The disability community has long been a solid ally in the response to HIV/AIDS. As we approach NHTD, I appreciate the opportunity as a guest blogger to speak to this community about HIV testing.
Why Take the Test?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than one million Americans are living with HIV; and one in five do not know their HIV status. 
To quote Dr. Frieden of the CDC:
Research shows that once people get tested, those who are HIV positive take steps to protect their partners from HIV. Testing HIV negative is also beneficial – as it empowers individuals to take stock of – and modify – risky sexual behaviors so that they can remain HIV negative.
If you are HIV positive – what you don’t know CAN hurt you – and others. A third of those with HIV are tested very late and develop AIDS within a year of their HIV diagnosis, which may be too late to utilize the full benefits of treatment. Approximately 17,000 Americans with AIDS still die each year.
Find a Testing Site 
We at AIDS.gov believe it is essential that we link people to local HIV test sites. I encourage everyone to use and share the HIV/AIDS Prevention & Service Provider Locator –  a simple tool for anyone in the U.S. to find HIV testing, prevention, housing, mental health, substance abuse and treatment services.
In addition, people can locate local HIV testing sites by sending a text message with their ZIP code to “KNOWIT” (566948), visiting www.HIVtest.org, or calling 800-CDC-INFO.
Want to know more?  

Competitors Form Partnership to Develop Autism Drugs



Two of the front-runners in the race to develop drugs to treat mental retardation and autism are joining forces, hoping to save money and get to the market sooner.
A deal, expected to be announced on Tuesday, will pool the resources of Roche, the Swiss pharmaceutical giant, and Seaside Therapeutics, a private 30-employee company based in Cambridge, Mass.
“This deal will establish the biggest effort to date” in autism drugs, Luca Santarelli, head of neuroscience for Roche, said before the announcement. Financial terms are not being disclosed.
There is rising excitement that drugs might be able to relieve some of the behavioral problems associated with autism and in particular a cause of autism and mental retardation known as fragile X syndrome. About 100,000 Americans have fragile X syndrome.
Some parents of children being treated with new drugs in clinical trials have said they see positive changes in behavior.
Becky Zorovic of Sharon, Mass., said that when she used to take her son Anders, who has fragile X, to the dentist, she would have to lie in the chair and hold him on top of her as he screamed.
But after Anders starting taking Seaside’s drug, arbaclofen, in a clinical trial, she said, “He sat in the chair by himself and he opened his mouth and let the dentist polish his teeth and even scrape his teeth.” Anders has also has gone to birthday parties, which he once refused to do, she said.
Still, Ms. Zorovic said that until the clinical trial comparing the drug to placebo was completed, it was difficult to say whether the effects were from the drugs or merely a result of parents’ perceptions.
The mechanism that has perhaps shown the most promise, at least in mice, is to damp signaling in the brain by blocking a receptor called mGluR5.
Novartis is considered ahead in developing such a drug. Roche is next, having entered the midstage of clinical trials. Seaside is further back but has patents covering the use of mGluR5 antagonists to treat neurodevelopmental disorders.
Under the deal, Roche will get exclusive rights to those patents from Seaside. That might provide some leverage that Roche can use against Novartis, although Dr. Santarelli said Roche had no intention of keeping a rival’s drug off the market.
Roche also gets the option to license commercial rights to Seaside’s arbaclofen. That drug, which works somewhat differently, is in late-stage testing for fragile X and in midstage testing for autism.
Roche will provide money to help Seaside complete its clinical trials of arbaclofen. Seaside will halt development of its own mGluR5 antagonist, which it licensed from Merck, and will instead receive royalties on sales of Roche’s drug.
The alliance could pose a challenge to Novartis. “This is No. 2 and No. 3 ganging up on No. 1,” said Dr. Michael Tranfaglia, medical director of the Fraxa Research Foundation, which sponsors research into treatments for fragile X syndrome.
Dr. Randall L. Carpenter, chief executive of Seaside, said the money from Roche was a needed diversification of the company’s funding. Virtually all of the $90 million Seaside has raised has come from the Barony Trust, which is run by Peter Whipp, a British investment manager.
“They would like to see new treatments,” Dr. Carpenter said, referring to Mr. Whipp and his family. “I think they carried us a long way, longer than they wanted to.”

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

ADA and Public Facilities Presented by: Richard Londono AAIA, CGC, BN






ADA and Public Facilities
Presented by: Richard Londono AAIA, CGC, BN
Thursday June 21st 2012
Time: 11:10 AM
Orlando Marriot World Center

You are all invited, contact us for more information: www.adaag-consulting.com

U.S. Access Board Releases Proposed Guidelines for Emergency Transportable Housing

U.S. Access Board Releases Proposed Guidelines for Emergency Transportable Housing
The U.S. Access Board has released for public comment accessibility guidelines for temporary housing provided by the government in emergencies and natural disasters. The proposed guidelines would supplement the Board’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines, which cover many types of facilities, including dwelling units, by adding provisions that specifically address emergency transportable housing. It would also supplement companion guidelines the Board maintains under the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA), which applies to federally funded facilities.
Emergency transportable housing units, which are designed and manufactured for transport over roadways, have a smaller footprint than other types of housing and pose unique accessibility challenges. Access to such housing was found to be problematic in the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The proposed rule would revise certain provisions in the ADA and ABA guidelines to address these types of units, including requirements for ramps, floor surfaces, kitchens, showers, and bedrooms. The proposal would require additional features, such as folding seats in roll-in showers, to improve accessibility. Some changes are responsive to design constraints and would provide exceptions from certain technical criteria for elements such as entry ramps under certain conditions. Accessible communication features, including smoke alarms and weather alert systems, are also addressed.
The proposed changes are based on consensus recommendations prepared by an advisory panel organized by the Board, the Emergency Transportable Housing Advisory Committee. This committee included representatives from disability groups, industry and code groups, and government agencies, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
The proposed rule includes a discussion of these requirements that highlights areas where additional information is sought. The deadline for comments on the guidelines is August 17. Comments can be submitted or viewed at www.regulations.gov. The Board will hold a public hearing on the proposed rule in Washington, D.C. on July 11 that will provide an additional forum for submitting comment and will offer a call-in option for those unable to attend in person. Additional details are posted on the Board’s website.
For further information, contact Marsha Mazz at mazz@access-board.gov, (202) 272-0020 (v), or (202) 272-0076 (TTY).
Public Hearing on the Proposed Guidelines for Emergency Transportable Housing
July 11, 9:30 – 11:30
Access Board Conference Center
1331 F Street, NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC
Call-in option (listening only):
Dial: (517) 308-9247 or (888) 469-2078 (toll-free)
Passcode: 4144
To submit comments by phone, contact Kathy Johnson in advance at johnson@access-board.gov, (202) 272-0041 (voice), or (202) 272-0065 (TTY).

Thursday, June 14, 2012

DON’T LEAVE US OUT!

DON’T LEAVE US OUT!

Take the Test. Take Control: National HIV Testing Day

Take the Test. Take Control: National HIV Testing Day

Categories: Disability.Blog News
By Miguel Gomez, Director, AIDS.gov 
Take the Test. Take Control. That’s the theme of National HIV Testing Day (NHTD), observed every year on June 27. President Obama has said National HIV Testing Day “reminds each of us to do our part in fighting HIV/AIDS and get tested. After years of critical investments in research, prevention and care, we now have the tools to stem the spread of the disease and extend the lives of those Americans living with HIV.”
As reported in a 2009 “Disability and HIV Policy Brief” from the UN Office of the High Commission for Human Rights, the World Health Organization and UNAIDS, “the relationship between HIV and disability has not received due attention, although people with disabilities are found among all key populations at higher risk of exposure to HIV.”  The brief discusses why persons with disabilities may be at risk for HIV infection. Reasons include risk behaviors, sexual violence and access to HIV education, information and prevention services.
The disability community has long been a solid ally in the response to HIV/AIDS. As we approach NHTD, I appreciate the opportunity as a guest blogger to speak to this community about HIV testing.
Why Take the Test?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than one million Americans are living with HIV; and one in five do not know their HIV status. 
To quote Dr. Frieden of the CDC:
Research shows that once people get tested, those who are HIV positive take steps to protect their partners from HIV. Testing HIV negative is also beneficial – as it empowers individuals to take stock of – and modify – risky sexual behaviors so that they can remain HIV negative.
If you are HIV positive – what you don’t know CAN hurt you – and others. A third of those with HIV are tested very late and develop AIDS within a year of their HIV diagnosis, which may be too late to utilize the full benefits of treatment. Approximately 17,000 Americans with AIDS still die each year.
Find a Testing Site 
We at AIDS.gov believe it is essential that we link people to local HIV test sites. I encourage everyone to use and share the HIV/AIDS Prevention & Service Provider Locator –  a simple tool for anyone in the U.S. to find HIV testing, prevention, housing, mental health, substance abuse and treatment services.
In addition, people can locate local HIV testing sites by sending a text message with their ZIP code to “KNOWIT” (566948), visiting www.HIVtest.org, or calling 800-CDC-INFO.
Want to know more?  

Closed-Captions on the Web: An Unfinished Battle

Closed-Captions on the Web: An Unfinished Battle

June 5, 2012  |  Josh Benjamin

There are nearly 150,000 television shows on air in the United States.

Thanks to the Decoder Circuitry Act, which was passed in 1990, and Americans with Disabilities Act, which was passed that same year, closed captions are available on our home television sets.  This technology means that deaf and hard of hearing Americans have access to 150,000 TV programs every day.

But times are changing.

Compare 150,000 television shows to 37 billion online videos. It takes just one month for YouTube to upload more video content than has been aired on the three major TV networks in over 60 years – and the vast majority of those videos are not closed-captioned.

Not only is it apparent that our computers are replacing our television sets, it is increasingly evident that television captions are not nearly as vital as captions on the internet.

Why?

First and foremost, captions make the web accessible. The internet is an indispensable tool of the 21st century – a tool of education, occupation, communication, and entertainment. It is near impossible to function in today’s society without at least occasional access to a wireless or broadband connection .With 84.5% of internet-users watching online videos each month, websites like YouTube, CNN, and Hulu have solidified their positions as staples of the internet. Without captioning, this content is completely inaccessible to millions of people.

Providing closed captions not only ensures that content is accessible; it makes the internet better for all users by optimizing search engines like Google or Bing. Unlike articles, which are easily searchable because they consist of words on a page, videos can be difficult to comb through. Search results for videos are based solely on the titles and tags their creators give them, which are sometimes irrelevant to the video, and the short descriptions that follow. If all online videos had closed-captions, we would be able to search the dialogue, music, and other sounds that appear within them­­­­­­­, making the internet a more useful tool than it already is.

So how can we caption all online video content? What steps have webpages already taken to do so? What steps has the government taken? And what supplementary measures must be adopted to achieve complete online accessibility?

Thanks to the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA), signed by President Obama in October of that year, the entertainment industry has been steadily embedding closed-captions into their streaming videos. The law requires broadcasters, by September 2013, to caption all television programs they redistribute on the web. Not surprisingly, TV shows and movies on Hulu, Netflix, ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox are almost all captioned.

But in the news media sector of the web, almost no videos are captioned. One of the major shortcomings of the CVAA is that it does not cover internet-only video content. The homepages of ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox’s news websites each feature uncaptioned video news reports, and web-based local news giant Patch.com provides no captioning requirements for its affiliates. Not only does the CVAA neglect internet-specific videos, it neglects user-generated content on sites like YouTube, which accounts for 46% of all videos on the web.

Notably, Youtube has taken several strides toward universal closed-captions. In 2008 it unveiled to users the option to embed closed captions into their own videos. The following year, it created a system which uses Google’s speech recognition technology to automatically transcribe audio into closed captions.

Still in beta, the technology is rarely accurate.

And even with the option to add captions to your own videos, users, for the most part, choose not to.

One of the most popular searches on YouTube, “funny video”, returns 13,300,000 results. If filtered to closed-captioned videos, the search yields a mere 138,000 results. Likewise, searching “Michael Jackson” returns 3,170,000 videos, and only 3,160 of those videos have captions.

So what more can be done?

In the spirit of video sharing, YouTube could unveil a system for users to add captions to videos that are not their own. Or even simpler, online news outlets like ABC could voluntarily add captions. World News Tonight did it in 1972, without prompt from the government.

While civil rights organizations including AAPD and our coalition allies worked hard to pass the CVAA and consider it a step forward for fully accessible online programming, experience shows that we need more.  The need for equal access to on line video content will only grow more urgent as this content area grows.

Perhaps what makes this issue most pertinent to the national discourse is the fact that complete online accessibility is essential to an economy that depends on the internet and workers who rely on its content. As we work to advance accessible technology through legislation, we also must convince individual YouTube users and online video outlets to accept the global necessity of closed-captions on the internet.
 
Source: http://www.aapd.com/resources/power-grid-blog/closed-captions-on-the-web.html

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Effective Hurricane Preparedness Requires All of Us Working Together


Categories: Emergency Preparedness
Photograph of Tony Rebinbas and his son getting mitigation information from Bill Praust, a FEMA Community Relations specialist, as Tyak, a service dog, looks on.
Flemington, N.J., October 22, 2011 -- Tony Rebinbas and his son get mitigation information from Bill Praust, a Community Relations specialist, as Tyak, a service dog, looks on. FEMA provides outreach for many programs offered to disaster survivors.
* Re-posted from the FEMA Blog 
By Guest Blogger Marcie Roth, Director, Office of Disability Integration and Coordination, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Department of Homeland Security
People often ask me why FEMA no longer calls people with disabilities and other people with access and functional needs “vulnerable” or “special needs”?
The answer is straightforward: it’s the people who fail to prepare who are the ones who are most vulnerable in disasters. When people with disabilities have a plan for disasters and are prepared, they are in a much better position to ensure that they have the best possible outcomes during and after a disaster such as a hurricane. With approximately 50 percent of the population having access and functional needs, those needs are not special, they are simply what the whole community needs to address when planning for disasters.
FEMA’s Office of Disability Integration and Coordination has been working closely with our partners and stakeholders in the disability community during this Hurricane Preparedness Week to spread the word about preparing for hurricanes, severe weather and other disasters. Last week, we held a call with representatives from the disability community and you can listen to the podcast and see the transcript from that call by visiting http://www.fema.gov/medialibrary/media_records/8726.
Unfortunately, people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs aren’t always included in their community’s emergency preparedness efforts. Whether you have access and functional needs yourself or know of others who do, we ask that you Be A Force of Nature and help your family, friends, colleagues and neighbors to make sure they’re prepared for the next hurricane or severe weather event. Consider becoming more involved in local, regional, and state emergency management efforts. In this respect, full inclusion in community preparedness efforts ensures that no one is “special” or has “special needs”. Rather, everyone is working together towards a fully prepared community.
In the “Conversations with FEMA” video,  Neil McDevitt, our Disability Integration Communications Specialist, joins me in talking about how the Office of Disability Integration and Coordination is working with our internal and external partners to enhance awareness of preparedness for the whole community and we’re also talking about steps we’re taking personally to prepare for hurricanes this year.
FEMA encourages all individuals in hurricane-prone areas to know your risk and make a pledge to prepare at www.ready.gov/hurricanes. You can complete your emergency preparedness plan, update your emergency kit and Be a Force of Nature and share your preparedness efforts with family, friends and Community partners.
For More Information:
 Marcie Roth is the director of the Office of Disability Integration and Coordination at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. In this role, she leads the agency’s commitment to meet the access and functional needs of children and adults with disabilities in emergency and disaster preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation. Before coming to FEMA, Ms. Roth was President and CEO of Global Disability Solutions Group, a leading national organization promoting diverse workforce initiatives with a focus on disability issues. She also served as a senior member of the Obama for America Disability Policy Committee and served on President Obama’s Justice and Civil Rights Transition Team.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

AODA Alliance Presses Two Cabinet Ministers on Plans to Finalize the Overdue Built Environment Accessibility Standard That the McGuinty Government Last August Promised to Enact “Promptly”

AODA Alliance Presses Two Cabinet Ministers on Plans to Finalize the Overdue Built Environment Accessibility Standard That the McGuinty Government Last August Promised to Enact “Promptly”

June 4, 2012
SUMMARY
The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act requires Ontario’s buildings to become accessible to persons with disabilities by or before 2025. To achieve this, for several years the McGuinty Government has been developing a Built Environment Accessibility Standard to enact under the AODA.
On August 19, 2011, during last year’s Ontario election campaign, Premier Dalton McGuinty wrote us to promise that the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that his Government had under development would be enacted “promptly.” To see Premier McGuinty’s 2011 disability accessibility election pledges, which were set out in his August 19, 2011 letter to us, visit http://www.aodaalliance.org/strong-effective-aoda/090220111.asp
We continue in our efforts to get the McGuinty Government to keep this election pledge. On Friday, June 1, 2012, the AODA Alliance wrote the two Ontario Government cabinet Ministers responsible to finalize the overdue Built Environment Accessibility Standard, to press for its enactment. This letter to Community and Social Services Minister John Milloy and Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Kathleen Wynne, set out below, raises five key issues:
1. We asked when the Government will be publicly posting a draft of the proposed Built Environment Accessibility Standard for public comment.
2. We asked the Government as soon as possible to release a summary of the intended contents of the proposed Built Environment Accessibility Standard, in advance of finalizing its precise legal language.
3. The Government plans to enact part of the new Built Environment Accessibility Standard in the form of amendments to the Ontario Building code. We asked the Government to commit that any new accessibility requirements to be added to the Ontario Building Code also be enacted as part of the enforceable Built Environment Accessibility Standard enacted under the AODA.
4. We asked the Government to include in the Built Environment Accessibility Standard, a requirement that when public sector organizations engage in downsizing of their buildings holdings, they give priority to closing inaccessible properties in favour of retaining more accessible properties.
5. The forthcoming Built Environment Accessibility Standard will not require retrofitting of any existing buildings that are not undergoing major renovations. We asked for a clear commitment now that as soon as the part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that addresses the sphere of the Ontario Building Code is enacted, the Government will immediately launch a prompt standards development process to develop a part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard to deal with retrofitting of existing buildings that are not slated for major renovations.
We last wrote the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for her plans for finalizing the Built Environment Accessibility Standard back on December 2, 2011. To see the AODA Alliance’s December 2, 2011 letter to the Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister, visit http://www.aodaalliance.org/strong-effective-aoda/12052011.asp
The minister’s response to that letter gave little detail. To read the Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister’s January 17, 2012 letter to the AODA Alliance, visit http://www.aodaalliance.org/strong-effective-aoda/05042012.asp
For a chronology and summary of key events in the Government’s efforts at developing the Built Environment Accessibility Standard, and its earlier commitments on completing that project, visit http://www.aodaalliance.org/strong-effective-aoda/07082011.asp
Send us your feedback. Write us at aodafeedback@gmail.com
*****
ACCESSIBILITY FOR ONTARIANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ALLIANCE
1929 Bayview Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M4G 3E8
Email: aodafeedback@gmail.com Twitter: @aodaalliance
Visit: www.aodalliance.org
June 1, 2012
via email: john.milloy@ontario.ca; kathleen.wynne@ontario.ca
Hon. John Milloy, Minister
Community and Social Services
6th Floor, Hepburn Block
80 Grosvenor Street
Toronto, Ontario M7A 1E9
and
Hon. Kathleen Wynne, Minister
Municipal Affairs & Housing
17th Floor, College Park
777 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5
Re: Built Environment Accessibility Standard
We write to ask important questions concerning your Government’s work on developing the promised Build Environment Accessibility Standard under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. Both of you as ministers, and both of your ministries, are involved in the development of this important accessibility standard.
Minister Wynne’s January 17, 2012 letter to us gave very little in the way of specifics on the Government’s plans. Each of the issues we raise here appears to require policy directions from you as ministers.
We have been told that the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing has responsibility for developing the part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that falls within the scope of the Ontario Building Code. We were also told that the Ministry of Community and Social Services has responsibility for developing the part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that deals with areas that the Building Code doesn’t cover, such as outdoor spaces. We understand that your Government is considering bringing forward two separate standards, one to address each of these parts, rather than one single standard.
We would welcome answers to the following issues:
1. We want to know when the Government will be publicly posting a draft of either or both of these two parts of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard, for public comment. The AODA requires that the Government post a proposed accessibility standard for public comment before it can enact it.
The Built Environment Accessibility Standard is long overdue. On June 1, 2010, the previous Community and Social Services Minister committed that the Built Environment Accessibility Standard and the other accessibility standards then under development would be enacted by the end of 2010. The Built Environment Accessibility Standard still remains to be enacted.
In the 2011 Ontario general election campaign, Premier McGuinty promised that this standard would be enacted “promptly.” That election took place nine months ago. We believe that “promptly” has already come and gone.
2. We ask the Government as soon as possible to release a summary of the intended contents of the two parts of the proposed Built Environment Accessibility Standard, in advance of finalizing its precise legal language. The Government commendably took a similar step in 2010 as it was finalizing the Integrated Accessibility Regulation. In making this request, we don’t want this to delay in any way the finalization of this standard. We are concerned that the Built Environment Accessibility Standard will be highly technical. It would therefore be very helpful for the Government to let the public know as soon as possible in non-technical language about the policy direction that the Government is considering heading.
3. We understand that the Government is planning to enact the part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that falls within the scope of the Ontario Building Code, by amending the Building Code itself. We have no objection to this, so long as the Government also enacts the very same requirements as an accessibility standard, passed under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. We urge this for four reasons:
First, we want to have access to the full enforcement/compliance regime that we won in the AODA. Unless these accessibility requirements for buildings are set out in an accessibility standard enacted under the AODA, we will have no access to those enforcement/compliance provisions.
Second, we want to have all the AODA’s protections of a review of these accessibility requirements every five years by a Standards Development Committee whose membership includes 50% representation of persons with disabilities. Third, we want the effectiveness of the entire Built Environment Accessibility Standard to be subject to the periodic Independent Review process that section 41 of the AODA requires. Fourth, we want the AODA’s protection that the accessibility standard cannot be altered without the rights of participation by the disability community that the AODA enshrines.
If these key building accessibility requirements are only enacted in the Building Code, but not in a parallel AODA accessibility standard, we will be unfairly denied all these entitlements and safeguards. We fought long and hard for those safeguards in the AODA. We do not want the Government through this process to, in effect, exempt from that future review the vital area of building accessibility that falls within the Building Code’s scope.
We see no downside to our proposal. Builders will not face conflicting requirements. This is because the same accessibility requirements will be enshrined both in the Building Code and the Built Environment Accessibility Standard.
The fact that the Building Code has its own compliance/enforcement regime doesn’t take away from the benefit of also having access to the AODA accessibility standard enforcement/compliance regime.
During the 2004-2005 debates in the Legislature over Bill 118, the proposed AODA, many Government statements about what would be achieved under that legislation focused on making buildings physically accessible. It is vital that the Government not now carve a large part of that field right out of the AODA.
The Building Code has historically lagged behind in the area of disability accessibility. Those responsible for keeping the Building Code up to date chronically did not do so in the disability context. That is what produced the pressing need for a Built Environment Accessibility Standard under the AODA. We don’t want to revert back to sole reliance on the failed regulatory regime that produced that longstanding and systemic deficiency in this area.
We therefore ask your Government to commit that any new accessibility requirements to be added to the Ontario Building Code also be enacted in an enforceable Built Environment Accessibility Standard enacted under the AODA.
4. We ask your Government to include in the Built Environment Accessibility Standard, a requirement that when public sector organizations engage in downsizing of their buildings holdings, they give priority to closing inaccessible properties in favour of retaining more accessible properties. For example, some school boards are closing some of their school buildings due to declining numbers of students. If a school board is considering closing some of its school buildings, the Built Environment Accessibility Standard should require wherever possible that the school board close schools that are more inaccessible, and keep open more accessible schools. It would be wrong, and a huge waste of public money, to close a school that has an elevator, and leave open a school that is only accessible via flights of stairs. The public sector should show this kind of leadership by not managing public infrastructure in a way that makes Ontario more inaccessible.
5. We seek a clear commitment now that as soon as the part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that addresses the sphere of the Ontario Building Code is enacted, the Government will immediately launch a prompt standards development process to develop a part of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard to deal with retrofitting of existing buildings that are not slated for major renovations.
When the Government first established the Built Environment Standards Development Committee, we understand that it only gave that Committee a mandate to develop accessibility proposals for new buildings or for major renovations of existing buildings. This raised serious concerns for persons with disabilities. Many if not most barriers in the built environment are in existing buildings which are not undergoing major renovations. The Built Environment Accessibility Standard provisions that are now under development will leave those barriers entirely intact. It will not require the removal of such barriers even if this can be readily achieved at little cost. That impedes the achievement of accessibility for many Ontarians with disabilities.
The AODA requires the Government to enact accessibility standards that will achieve a fully accessible Ontario by 2025. This includes achieving full accessibility of the built environment. The provisions of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard that are now under development will not be able to come close to achieving this, no matter how strong and effective they are, because they won’t require retrofit of any existing buildings that are not undergoing major renovations.
During 2004-2005 debates in the Legislature over the proposed AODA, the Government justified setting a long twenty-year deadline for achieving full accessibility in no small part because it would take that long to address the many current barriers in existing buildings. Yet, fully seven years into that twenty-year period, we have no requirements for retrofitting those buildings, if not undergoing a major renovation, and no such requirements under development.
It was clear during Second Reading debates in the Legislature on Bill 118, the proposed AODA, that your Government intended to address retrofitting of existing buildings to achieve accessibility. For example, on November 18, 2004, during Second Reading debates on bill 118, Khalil Ramal, Parliamentary Assistant to Citizenship Minister Marie Bountrogianni (the minister who was sponsoring that bill), described tangible results that we should expect:
“If passed, this legislation would make a real difference in the lives of people with disabilities….a parent who uses a wheelchair and attends a school play could sit in the main seating area to watch his or her children perform; a teenager who uses an ambulatory device could take a regular bus with a friend to go to a movie at the local mall; or an elderly patient who has diminished vision and uses a scooter could make his way into a medical building through a ramp and an automatic door that are clearly marked with large print signs and then take an elevator with voice commands and a lowered button panel as he goes to have an X ray.”
Similarly, on that same day, Ms. Wynne, you said: “So we need to make sure that there’s access for children in every part of this province to the schools that they need to go to, to the colleges, to the universities. That’s a critical piece of this because we have got to educate the whole province, and in order to do that, we’ve got to make sure that students can get to those institutions of learning.”
Your Government committed in July 2009 to address barriers in existing buildings through the standards development process after it completes the first round of development of the Built Environment Accessibility Standard. The McGuinty Government commitment on the future development of accessibility standards to address retrofits of existing buildings is available at http://www.aodaalliance.org/strong-effective-aoda/07242009.asp
We want the Government to let us know what specific concrete steps it will undertake to that end, and when they will be taken.
As always, we are eager to do whatever we can to assist. We are pleased to discuss them at any time. These steps are important if Ontario is to get back on schedule for achieving full accessibility by 2025.
Sincerely,
David Lepofsky, CM, O. Ont.
Chair, AODA Alliance
cc: Premier Dalton McGuinty, fax (416) 325-3745, dmcguinty.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org
Marguerite Rappolt, Deputy Minister, Community & Social Services, fax (416) 325-5240, marg.rappolt@ontario.ca
Ellen Waxman, Assistant Deputy Minister for the Accessibility Directorate, Ministry of Community and Social Services, fax (416) 325-9620, ellen.waxman@ontario.ca
William Forward, Deputy Minister, Municipal Affairs & Housing, william.forward@ontario.ca
Elizabeth Harding, Assistant Deputy Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Municipal Services Division, liz.harding@ontario.ca
Brenda Lewis, Director, Building and Development Branch, Municipal Services Division, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Brenda.Lewis@ontario.ca
To sign up for or unsubscribe from AODA Alliance e-mail updates write to aodafeedback@gmail.com
Follow us on Twitter and get others to! Twitter.com/aodaalliance
Learn more at: www.aodaalliance.org
UNITED FOR A BARRIER-FREE ONTARIO

Monday, June 4, 2012

How to Get Quick Approval for Certain Disability Claims


The Social Security Administration provides long-term disability benefits to U.S. workers who are unable to work for more than 12 months due to a physical, mental or emotional medical condition.
Although evaluating each case might take several months or even years, Social Security can fast-track the process for some cases if they fall under its Compassionate Allowances Program.
This is an initiative designed to streamline the process so that applicants can quickly receive benefits for conditions that are known to cause severe or life-threatening disabilities.

How it Works

The Social Security Administration (SSA) introduced the Compassionate Allowances Program in 2008 with about 50 diseases and conditions, including certain cancers, adult brain disorders and immune system conditions. Today, the list includes a little more than 100 conditions, and by the summer of 2012 it is expected to grow to 165.
“These are diseases that are so severe that we do not need to obtain the applicant’s complete work history in order to make a decision, and therefore the process is quicker,” said Diana Varela, a spokesperson for the agency in Washington DC.
SSA is constantly evaluating new conditions to add to the list. You can see most updated version of the diseases and conditions in the Compassionate Allowances Program on the SSA website.

How to Apply

The process to apply for the Compassionate Allowances Program is the same as applying for general disability benefits. However, if the SSA determines that a condition qualifies for the Compassionate Allowances Program, the approval process is much quicker.
You can apply for disability benefits online without having to go to a Social Security office. Generally, you will need to provide the following information:
  • General information such as your name, date of birth, and Social Security number, as well as those of your spouse and underage children. Also, you need to provide your bank account information and an additional contact in case you cannot be reached.
  • Medical information such as name, address and telephone numbers of doctors, clinics and hospitals where you receive treatment, as well as your employer’s information. Also, the name of the medicines you have taken and medical history, among other things.

How to Get More Information

To find out more information about Social Security benefits visit SocialSecurity.gov or call (800) 772-1213.
Source: http://blog.usa.gov/post/24194295514/how-to-get-quick-approval-for-certain-disability-claims